Weak Oppose - I do agree with others' opinions that he has potential, but I think the behavior issues brought up don't make him a suitable chat mod at the current time. This is highlighted by the fact that I was one of the few staff members to witness an example of the above behavior firsthand.
FalcoLombardi99: Remove. He isn't very active in chat or on the wiki, and also supports his own removal.
All others: Support. I can't think of any reasons to remove any of the other staff members.
I nominate Jamesb1, since he has returned from his hiatus, been coming to chat regularly, and has shown positive behavior essentially all of the time.
Support - I feel like the old proposal could turn away users who simply don't feel like editing, like users who'd prefer to just chat.
Support - In fact, the previous proposal technically closed as invalid, and it was never really strictly enforced anyway.
To add to this, like Mess, I was also not in chat for the discussion about adding more staff members, but this doesn't give me any reason to think that we do not need any more staff.
Support - Same reasons that Korra gave.
Oppose - At his current levels of experience and activity, I don't think he is qualified for the role.
Neutral - While I acknowledge the above comments, I'm not sure if we really need another bureaucrat. We already have two bureaucrats, is there a reason we'd want to have a third one? But then again, I'm not really sure, which is why I voted neutral.
Oppose - I don't think you really have enough experience yet to become a chat moderator.
I voted oppose.
Support - In general, bureaucrat rights aren't needed too often here, and should be used carefully and only after discussions, so having less bureaucrats may be better. However, they now can also be useful if you want to add a bot flag to your account in order to make repetitive edits without flooding the Recent Changes.
Support - for reasons listed above.
I support, as I think he was a good admin.
I'm gonna vote neutral.
Messenger Deception: Support
Arch Wizard Megumin: Support
South Ferry: Oppose
While I understand that my request may be declined, I think having CheckUser rights would help me deal with trolls and sockpuppets faster and easier. Recently we've had a number of users cause problems, mainly in chat, by creating sockpuppets to evade their bans, using alternate accounts for the purpose of deceiving people, or otherwise abusing multiple accounts. In situations like this I've checked to see if two users had the same IP by blocking both and seeing how many IPs are autoblocked. However, that method can be time consuming and does not always work, especially if someone changes their IP address to evade a block.
I've been on Fandom for over 2 years, and I'm a bureaucrat on two other notable wikis, the Mafia Wiki and the Panic! At The Disco Wiki. So I feel like I have enough experience to be trusted to use CheckUser rights properly, and only when truly needed.
I agree with Speedit.