Neutral - After thinking about my reasons for supporting, and after reading Korra's response to my initial vote, and Akumi's reasons for opposing, I'm willing to reconsider my support vote and change it to neutral. I'm also changing my vote because I have actually seen Freezy do good work for the RP recently, and while that may not be related to chat directly, I still feel that it is worth something. Also personally I do feel that perhaps the OP does focus on rights more often than is necessary.
I'm talking about his general behaviour than just his behaviour as a chat moderator. I never said that he has argued with users since. Though I'm still unsure whether his behaviour can currently reflect that of a responsible chat moderator. It's possible that I may change my vote to neutral after giving it some more thought.
S̶u̶p̶p̶o̶r̶t̶ ̶-̶ ̶I̶ ̶h̶a̶v̶e̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶r̶e̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶s̶e̶e̶n̶ ̶m̶u̶c̶h̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶a̶ ̶r̶e̶a̶s̶o̶n̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶ ̶D̶o̶w̶n̶t̶o̶w̶n̶ ̶F̶r̶e̶e̶z̶y̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶r̶e̶m̶a̶i̶n̶ ̶a̶s̶ ̶a̶ ̶c̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶m̶o̶d̶e̶r̶a̶t̶o̶r̶,̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶I̶ ̶p̶r̶e̶t̶t̶y̶ ̶m̶u̶c̶h̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶b̶y̶ ̶a̶l̶l̶ ̶m̶y̶ ̶p̶o̶i̶n̶t̶s̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶I̶ ̶r̶a̶i̶s̶e̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶l̶a̶s̶t̶ ̶r̶e̶v̶i̶e̶w̶ ̶w̶h̶i̶c̶h̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶e̶v̶e̶n̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶c̶l̶u̶d̶e̶d̶ ̶a̶ ̶m̶o̶n̶t̶h̶ ̶a̶g̶o̶.̶ ̶W̶h̶i̶l̶e̶ ̶F̶r̶e̶e̶z̶y̶'̶s̶ ̶b̶e̶h̶a̶v̶i̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶m̶o̶r̶e̶ ̶g̶o̶o̶d̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶n̶ ̶b̶a̶d̶,̶ ̶I̶ ̶s̶t̶i̶l̶l̶ ̶f̶e̶e̶l̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶i̶t̶ ̶c̶a̶n̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶u̶r̶r̶e̶n̶t̶l̶y̶ ̶r̶e̶f̶l̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶r̶e̶s̶p̶o̶n̶s̶i̶b̶l̶e̶ ̶c̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶m̶o̶d̶e̶r̶a̶t̶o̶r̶.̶ Changing my vote to Neutral (see reason below)
C.Syde's afro: Oppose
Matt Damon's damonic testing facilities: Neutral
Reader x Blossom Cane: Neutral
The Damon's Light: Support
Chris Wellington x You: Support
Quite nice. Though I can't wait to revert back to the classic design, since some of the buttons don't stand out as much.
I'm afraid, what Brick said is correct. A user who could have been qualified back in the day may not necessarily be qualified today. Arguing with other users over whether you're qualified or not won't get you very far if the majority of the users aren't in favour of you being promoted. The best advice I can give you is trying not to bend facts that others have proven and work on addressing their concerns, then I may be able to support you next time round. But as I have already stated in my previous message, I'm afraid I cannot do so right now.
Oppose - That may be so, but this request isn't about the current staff members. It is about yourself. The mistakes that you've made recently may be small, but the size doesn't matter. While I have seen you try to address the concerns that others have raised in the past, I still see you make mistakes that are unsuitable for a prospective staff member. It is a mistake for applicants to be fully polished off, but I remain unconvinced that you make the cut at the moment.
Downtown Freezy - Weak Oppose - While Downtown Freezy is fairly active as a roleplayer, I haven't really seen much moderating from his end. In addition to lack of moderating, I have also seen some behavioural issues from his end that I don't consider to be quite right for a chat moderator, a few of those issues have already been mentioned by Akumi and Endercat. While Freezy isn't necessarily a bad chat moderator overall, I must admit that I do feel that the current administration team could work the same without him.
EarthlingnAkumi - Moderate Support - While I do agree that perhaps Akumi could be more active in chat, as a whole I feel that she does a reasonably good job as a chat and discussion moderator. So without further ado, she has my support.
Qstlijku - Moderate Support - Qstlijku is certainly active in general administrating as well as chat moderating. He isn't very active in RPing, but then being active in RPing is not how I primarily judge whether someone should or should not remain in their position. While I have seen a few other minor areas that I feel Qstlijku could be more active in, I have no pressing issues with him remaining in his position.
South Ferry - Moderate to Strong Support - Of the TDL Administration, South is one of the lives and souls, if not the life and soul of the RP. He is constantly active in the RP and helping it to progress forward. South isn't fully polished by any means, but then I don't think I've ever come across a bureaucrat that is fully polished off. In other words, he has my support.
TheKorraFanatic - Moderate to Strong Support - While I do agree with the points that Korra himself has stated that he needs to improve on, I don't really see anything that he needs to work on that warrants bringing up. Therefore, I have no pressing issues with him remaining in his position.
Support - There hasn't been much need for temporary promotions lately anyway.
I agree with most of those points. Though I'll just clarify that I do intentionally use my rights in cases where a situation calls for such a thing. But there has been the odd occasion where I'm unsure whether certain action is required.
Like, one has to be absolutely sure that what another person said really is serious enough to warrant action. Usually if I'm unsure, then I discuss it with the others and see what they think.
But I have to admit that I did forget to do just that on one occasion, and I will work hard to ensure that won't happen again. I'm becoming more active now than I was over the last few months, so that's a plus, since I will have more time to prove my worth.
Just thought I'd mention that the only reason I modded for those things was because I was unaware at the time that modding for those things would be frowned upon. I have understood that I have made a few mistakes since the last review. But they were issues that I had not foreseen. Now that I am aware that I handled those issues the wrong way, I know how to handle them the right way.
It was of my opinion that users shouldn't really get away with doing memes on people if they know that they'll make the target users uncomfortable. But I now know that that practice isn't considered to be okay, and that doing memes on people even if you know that they'll make the other person uncomfortable or irritated does not fall under harassment.
I am an administrator, but I'm also human. Being an administrator doesn't automatically make you do everything right. I wouldn't say that I was bullying users into stopping, when users should be expected to not do things if they know perfectly well that they'll bother the person in question.
I am aware that I handled the situation the wrong way, but I have learned from that. If another user had been in my position at the time, I would have done my best to help them, and try to get the other user to stop doing the things that they knew were bothering the target person.
Also I was solely responsible for getting rid of three troublesome accounts, each of which spammed the chat via console, and causing the chat to crash. There weren't any logs recorded regarding the incident because the weight of the spam caused my bot to crash and not record the logs.
You might say that yes, my bot beat me into banning the users. But that was only because chat crashed which made it impossible for me to ban. In the end I had to ban them by going into the contributions menu. And I had to disconnect my bot from the chat to stop it from continually rebanning the users over and over. I feel that it would be unfair to not give me the credit for that.
Another thing is that I have done a lot of work categorising templates and categories. But I also deleted a large number of categories that were deemed unnecessary. Maintenance is one of the things where admins excel, and I have worked reasonably hard in that area. I have been helping to fix up a lot of red links. A lot of those links being in places that a non-administrator or non-discussion moderator wouldn't have been able to edit.
I also recently edited the wiki's mobile main page which was until recently untouched. I did that purely out of respect towards users that only use mobile to access the wiki. Only Administrators are able to edit the wiki's mobile main page. And the description of the wiki's mobile main page also shows up in discussions, not only to mobile users, but to everybody. I also maintained areas of the wiki's discussions by updating the outdated parts in the discussions guidelines. And fixing up links that are now broken.
Lastly, I haven't done as much to prove myself in recent months because I have been rather busy with my other priorities between the last review and this one. And the constant memes which I found horrendously unfunny, annoying, and repetitive had resulted in me becoming less active in the hopes that I don't have to put up with them as much.
But I have recently become more active and have worked hard to improve the wiki. I would help out with the RP more, but it's just not one of my specialities. I'm not the best at RPing and never have been. So unfortunately I haven't been able to help much with the RPing.
Strong Oppose - The better option would be to start enforcing them again. I'm not even aware that some of these were no longer being enforced. Nor do I believe that some of these aren't still being enforced.
Moderate to Weak Oppose - I'm sorry, but I think you need to work on your behaviour some more. While I do see a lot of potential in you, I'm afraid potential can only do so much, which isn't enough to make up for things. Consider the advice that myself and others give you and I'll be happy to support you next time around. But I'm afraid, I cannot do so right now.
Oppose - Two weeks is totally unnecessary. I have yet to find a wiki that keeps requests open for that long.
Strong Support - While this isn't necessarily in our biggest hour of need for more discussion moderator candidates, I still feel that Akumi is qualified for the position, and therefore she has my support.
Weak Support - I'm not bothered either way, but I weakly support it continuing because I don't see any major reasons why it shouldn't.
Extremely Weak Oppose - While Freezy does have the potential, I don't believe that there's any immediate need for more chat moderators at this time. Also, I'm rather unsure about Freezy's behaviour, since I have seen a few minor, yet unignorable issues.
Yes, but not all users that overuse caps are trolls.
Well true. But I do feel that most users should keep the caps limit in mind after they are reminded the first time.